Background checks are becoming more common in the recruiting process. Employers may choose to conduct background checks for several reasons, delving more deeply into the process if the security level of the position requires it. A standard background check for a position may include verifying a candidate’s employment history, school records, and criminal history. But what about professional references, social media channels, and credit reports? Are these acceptable methods for conducting background checks?
The first thing every recruiter and HR professional looking to conduct background checks should become familiar with is the Fair Trade Commission’s Fair Credit Reporting Act, which sets the standard for employment background checks, or “consumer reports” as they’re referred to by the FCRA.
The FCRA stipulates that an employer must obtain written authorization from the candidate, separate from an employment application, before performing a background check. It also states that if the employer uses the results of the background check for an “adverse action,” whether it’s a decision not to offer employment or a promotion, or even terminating an employee, the candidate in question should be told and is eligible to request a copy of his/her background check.
While most of the standards set forth in the FCRA apply to consumer reporting agencies (CRAs), which are often hired by employers to perform background checks, if you are doing the checking on your own it’s still a good idea to follow their recommendations. Some of them, like notifying the applicants about adverse actions, apply to all employers.
So, if you’re responsible for doing your company’s background checks, what should you cover? The answer depends on the regulations in your state and the requirements for the job. In some states, employers can ask about a candidate’s history, including any arrests, but in many states, including California and New York, they cannot. And in all cases, the job requirements need to be the blueprint for the information you seek. Even if the job doesn’t require a security clearance, you will want to consider performing the following background checks.
Consider establishing a standard, written employment background check policy for your company, as the foundation for every check conducted. It’s also wise to obtain written consent from each candidate before performing any background checks. This way, you’ll have a straightforward approach that covers your legal obligations and leaves you, your hiring managers, and potential candidates all on the same page, so you’ll avoid any potential litigation while protecting the security of your company.
While it is expensive to screen and hire people to find the right fit for a position, bad hires can cost you in terms of their productivity and, if you have to let them go, additional hiring expenses. Download this e-book to learn how you can use up-to-date best practices to prevent the best employees from leaving.
View Now
5 Comments
No matter what kind of background check you are going to do, you’d better work out a scheme, so that you won’t appear to be discriminating. Ideally every organization must have an approved procedure for background check for each and every position within it. If such procedures are developed by professionals in accordance with your country and state legislation, this may save lots of hassle.
As regards social network background checks, why not stay out of people’s life away from the workplace and rely on a solid recruiting and hiring process that collects information that is related only to what is required to perform the job? Isn’t it completely illegal to reject someone for reasons that are not based on their ability to perform at the job?
Having devoted my best years to human resources, I’ve ended up considering LinkedIn to be a really good social media for checking out candidates, as people can post their employment history and have recommendations from other professionals who they have worked with. Asking people for their password to access any site is a violation of civil and social rights that every individual needs in the world of technology. Facebook and Twitter are social networks, therefore should not be considered for background checks by a recruiting professional.
I agree that now privacy is becoming a thing of the past and it seems that we shouldn’t be surprised that the use of social networks for job and candidate search is tolling its bell by being used for background checks. But I just we have a responsibility to follow the basic regulations about how people should be evaluated for work.
If anyone in a hiring position views a candidate’s social network profile, and the profile shows that person is part of a protected class such as age, race, disability, gender, religion, etc, then the organization may be at risk for a claim of hiring discrimination. Social media background screening risks are compound because usually hiring managers have easy access to social media networks and most web browsers keep the viewing history.