In Punished by Rewards, author Alfie Kohn suggests that workplace incentives can often lead to unintended negative consequences. He proposes the elimination of what he calls “carrot and stick psychology” in the workplace and other institutional settings to reduce potential negative outcomes.
Despite his legitimate point, in some ways, Kohn may be scrapping a salvageable system too hastily. Careful consideration of the need for and outcomes of any reward program is the best way for employers and managers to institute systems that work ideally for their workplace. Here are three considerations for employers and leaders before implementing a rewards program for their team or organization.
While it’s obvious that all of our work for “reward” on some level (after all, no one goes to work without a paycheck on the line), a workplace focused on rewarding individual performance can have some inherent problems.
In the past, incentive programs have focused on individuals almost exclusively. In today’s more co-operative office environment, however, it can be hard to know whose contribution led to a specific result. Take, for example, the decline in using individual performance reviews as a tool for determining promotions and salary.
By emphasizing team success, employers may find that individual members achieve more as they gain from other’s strengths, which are offered more freely in an environment where competition between team members is not the main focus.
Personally, I’m a fan of encouraging employees to recognize their peers for projects in which they collaborated well, as this fosters employee engagement, teamwork, and peer recognition, which leads to amazing work culture, increased retention, and more productive and higher performing employees.
While Kohn advocates eliminating rewards altogether, it is clear to anyone in a professional environment that if implemented thoughtfully, rewards can be effective motivators. Whether your rewards program is designed to correct a perceived problem or to drive higher achievement in an already functioning system, start from the desired outcome when designing rewards.
By designing recognition and rewards to encourage workforce success, you can build stronger teams and reduce the perceived favoritism often associated with these programs. Rewards that are too narrow may promote the success of some individuals with specific talents over the necessary hard work of those that contribute significantly to that outcome. Study the desired outcome carefully before implementing your rewards, and keep the whole system in mind.
Don’t resort to using a certain rewards system just because that’s what’s been done in the past. It’s okay to admit mistakes, and it’s extremely important to learn from them. If your organization has experienced negative fallout from rewards in the past, redesigned rewards may still work well for you. Audit your rewards programs regularly to make sure you are, in fact, achieving the desired outcome. Make changes to achieve the best results, and avoid simply following your own plan or someone’s example.
Remain proactive about making rewards work for you. Don’t be afraid to ask tough questions and to face the truth when it becomes evident. Ultimately, everyone wants to earn a living doing something they enjoy. When rewards interfere with this goal, it’s time to consider changes.
Alfie Kohn’s book can be used by some to deny performance-improvement opportunities, which would be disastrous for the current work environment. Organizations are focused on not only building strong teams, but also strong individuals that can help the business.
Every company needs a rewards system that focuses on both teams and individuals while choosing the right outcome. A competitive team working towards a general goal for the company, in addition to adding some individual goals, would be a win for a business.
A reward can be a punishment if the reasons for denying the reward are not objective, or if the reward is given based on reasons other than top performance. It can lead to discrimination and unhappy employees. This doesn’t mean rewards have to be eliminated, but just awarded correctly.